- #View x rays in cdr dicom server full#
- #View x rays in cdr dicom server registration#
- #View x rays in cdr dicom server software#
Mathie AG, Strickland NH (1997) Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ (2002) Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
#View x rays in cdr dicom server full#
Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F et al (2007) A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. May GA, Deer DD, Dackiewicz D (2000) Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow. Mack S, Holstein J, Kleber K et al (2000) New aspects of image distribution and workflow in radiology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 66(1):41–45 Maass M, Kosonen M, Kormano M (2001) Cost analysis of Turku University Central Hospital PACS in 1998. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):124–126Ĭolin C, Vergnon P, Guibaud L, et al (1998) Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care. J Digit Imaging 15(3):161–169Īndriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG (2002) Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):72–77Īndriole KP (2002) Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. Van Ooijen PM, Roosjen R, de Blecourt MJ et al (2006) Evaluation of the use of CD-ROM upload into the PACS or institutional web server. This can also include it being implemented in the digital system used in the inpatient part of the hospital and, therefore, making any other consultations or second opinions easily accessible.
#View x rays in cdr dicom server registration#
One of the solutions might be that the CD-Rs be given to the registration desk and the data being already prepared when the patient sees the doctor. This increase of preparation time required by a highly qualified staff member has implications on the economics and logistics and has a negative impact on daily clinical practice. This latter problem will be assessed in another study.
#View x rays in cdr dicom server software#
In major centres, patients present with different software and software in other languages, which increase the required time even further. In spite of ideal conditions, digital X-rays on CD-R need significantly more time in the orthopaedic clinic. The presentation of conventional X-rays required 21 s (☗.5 s) and of digital X-rays 90 s (☒7 s), respectively ( P < 0.001). The results were compared using a non-linked Student’s t-test (significance level P = 0.05). As a precondition, the computer was turned on and the same viewing software was used for all digital sets.
Time in seconds was measured for six experienced orthopaedic residents to present the most recent a.p. Ten sets of six X-rays for each case were prepared in both the conventional way and in digital format on CD-R. This technique is potentially more time-consuming for the clinician compared to conventional pictures. X-rays are presented on CD-Rs in a digital format with increasing frequency.